Due to the implications last few years ago road users have been subjected to new road rules and tougher penalties
Due to this people non other then your self who are interested in acquiring i license car/bike must take in to consideration on all the implications a car and a bike have been impended a penalty on driving hours and so on. this is not just a asking answer but more for every one else as i thought it be nice to mention.
A motor bike has it’s implications cheaper but also has it’s down sides.
A car is safer true but for a person to want a car but have restrictions "applied" due to the fact other reckless drivers cause from: drink driving to drugs even from a mere distraction all these things add up.
You cannot justify a car too bike if a persons decision is made before that person even decided, you have mothers/kids/teenagers who want their license but cannot afford the hours for driving instructor and most lie in log books so it only cheats you in the end.
Most kids have the lack of parents teaching their kids to drive some just do not make the time. occasionally most do that’s when kids choose to buy a bike not for the fact tat the bike isn’t safe but due to the fact that this kid/teenager or what ever works studies and has not got the time to do 120 due to the implications people previously did in the past "as mentioned above" not only make driving safer but restrict people who need a license from obtaining the hours
Few years back it was cheaper for any one to go to a driving instructor now it ranges over 50$ and if i aid to any one best to be an instructor id be driving now teaching……..
I cannot say kids/teenagers go get a motor bike due to the fact cars are time waster but people cannot justify a means to what is right or wrong if this persons never had either of these licenses, if you give a person a license but lay down what is safe or not? of cause they will go for a car, but if you restrict them from getting a license i mean make it much harder they will no doubt buy a motor bike regardless of the consequences in my opinion to obtain a license should be at thee age "20" most times a teenager is in the early stages "study" not consuming alcohol and drugs!
I believe a system should be made fair but it’s really hard to tell a person who is walking along the road who could be a safer driver because he/she does not drink a and seems assertive from her/he’s surroundings before an oncoming car almost runs you down just because that person was on a mobile phone… it’s easy to discriminate and place a person as an number because a system like that is easier but people have different circumstances not every one lives under one same roof? if a person wants a bike i say go get one we are almost confused enough on climate change but the truth always shines dim for most people i bet in 10 years from now prisoners will be driving instructors and premiums would sky rocket.
In Foreign country’s people usually have a different driving system but when you bring them here most seem glad they didn’t have to do australian license and that really just annoys any one who wants to obtain a license…. fair in the 80’s you had written tests and i will say those drivers of today are safer but i cannot speculate to far from home
Theres alot of things these days that are not right!
A system should be made fair not unfair In 5 years who knows it might be 20 hours and then againt the cylce continues
all i can say is lifes short want a motor bike licnese get one you can always get a car license later
want a car and have the lessons obtain one
Technorati Tags: distraction, driving instructor, drugs, fact c, google, instructor id, log books, motor bike, parents, reckless drivers, road rules, road users, script type, teenager, teenagers, text javascript